- Testing the latest hardware
Intel Penryn architecture - Benchmark: LAME & WinRAR
CPU Chipset - Published on Monday, 28 January 2008 01:30 Written by Robert Kihlberg
|
Lame Flertrådad [s] | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
|
WinRAR Benchmark [kb/s] | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Lame is a benchmark that's picky when it comes to cache and FSB. The graphs clearly shows that QX9650 is the better performer in these kinds of benchmarks thanks to the improvements of the architecture. WinRAR however, tends to be very sensitive when it comes to changes in the cache and memory performance. The bigger cache has an undeniably effect and the QX9650 performs almost 10% better than the QX6850.
Let's take a closer look at Futuremark's test suites.
Skip TOC
Article Index
- Intel Penryn architecture
- Penryn: models and product names
- Penryn: hardware analysis
- Penryn: frequency and power consumption
- Penryn: updated architecture
- Test system
- Power consumption
- Benchmarks: Everest Ultimate Edition 2006
- Benchmark: SuperPi & wPrime
- Benchmarks: Cinebench
- Benchmark: LAME & WinRAR current position
- Benchmarks: 3DMark
- Benchmarks: 3DMark 06 CPU & PCMark 05
- Benchmarks: Games
- Overclocking
- Conclusion
Page 11 of 16
On what should NordicHardware spend more time?
RSS Feed
