‚Äč
Nordichardware Logo

Intel Penryn architecture - Benchmark: LAME & WinRAR

Lame
FlertrŚdad [s]
QX9650
  44
 
QX6850
  49
 
  0 11 22 33 44 55


WinRAR
Benchmark [kb/s]
QX9650
  2418
 
QX6850
  2226
 
  0 540 1080 1620 2160 2700


Lame is a benchmark that's picky when it comes to cache and FSB. The graphs clearly shows that QX9650 is the better performer in these kinds of benchmarks thanks to the improvements of the architecture. WinRAR however, tends to be very sensitive when it comes to changes in the cache and memory performance. The bigger cache has an undeniably effect and the QX9650 performs almost 10% better than the QX6850.

Let's take a closer look at Futuremark's test suites.

Page 11 of 16

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Våra köprekommendationer


Våra köpguider



Undersökning

Elektronikbranschen says "This has gone too far" when it comes to Copyswedes demand on storage fees.What do you think?






Results
RSS Feed