- Testing the latest hardware
Intel Penryn architecture - Benchmarks: Cinebench
CPU Chipset - Published on Monday, 28 January 2008 01:30 Written by Robert Kihlberg
|
Cinebench 9.5 Enkeltrådad [poäng] | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
|
Cinebench 9.5 Flertrådad [poäng] | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
|
Cinebench 10 Enkeltrådad [poäng] | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
|
Cinebench 10 Flertrådad [poäng] | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
We have used the same scale with each program in order to show how much faster a quad-core CPU is compared to single-core CPU. Regardless if the benchmarks are single or quad, the QX9650 perform better than the QX6850.
Next, we test Lame and WinRAR.
Skip TOC
Article Index
- Intel Penryn architecture
- Penryn: models and product names
- Penryn: hardware analysis
- Penryn: frequency and power consumption
- Penryn: updated architecture
- Test system
- Power consumption
- Benchmarks: Everest Ultimate Edition 2006
- Benchmark: SuperPi & wPrime
- Benchmarks: Cinebench current position
- Benchmark: LAME & WinRAR
- Benchmarks: 3DMark
- Benchmarks: 3DMark 06 CPU & PCMark 05
- Benchmarks: Games
- Overclocking
- Conclusion
Page 10 of 16
On what should NordicHardware spend more time?
RSS Feed
