| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Andreas G Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:28 am Post subject: RV770 has 800 SPs, breaks 1.2TFLOPS, final clocks |
|
|
Remember how we told you that Eastern sources claimed that RV770 has 800 shader processors, not just 480 shader processors? When we look at the slide presented to us by a reliable source, we can only conclude that they were right. AMD evidently planted the stories of 480 shader processors (it's not uncommon for AMD/ATI to plant stuff). The slide tells us three things about both Radeon HD 4850 and 4870. First of all that they both sport a whopping 800 shader processors, but also the clock frequencies and they're individual calculation capacity measured in FLOPS. We've already told you that Radeon HD 4850 will launch at 625MHz and that AMD will clock the 4870 at at least 100MHz more, the slide says 750MHz. Each shader shader unit is capable of 2 FLOPS, and since we now have 800 units, this means that Radeon HD 4850 with its 625MHz will hit exactly 1TFLOPS. That should explain why AMD/ATI chose that specific frequency. Radeon HD 4870 with its 750MHz core will have 20% more processing power available and hits 1.2TFLOPS. A decent quad-core processor can do up to 100GFLOPS. This is certainly a slap in NVIDIA's face. AMD's mainstream chip can do more FLOPS than NVIDIA enthusiast chips, and AMD's coming high-end chips will pack twice the FLOPS...
 Click to enlarge and get rid of the blur
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Skyguy Writer
Joined: 09 Oct 2007 Posts: 145 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And if prices are kept reasonable, this could put ATI in a good position to challenge Nv's market share.
Good for all of us  _________________
Lian-Li A71B | Q6600 @ 3.5 on TEC/H2O | ASUS Maximus SE X38 | 4gb Corsair Dominators - 8500 | Raptors RAID 0 | 1Tb Barracudas | MSI 8800 Ultra SC | Coolermaster 850w | 2x22" Dell LCD | X-Fi Xtreme | G15 Rev.2 | G5 Rev.2 | |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hsew Member

Joined: 08 Jun 2008 Posts: 25 Location: In ur PC stealin' ur Megahertz
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if this is the case then nVidia is screwed. Although, a lot of people on the internet keep saying that this information is fake, and I kinda think it's too good to be true. It just says we got the slide from a "reliable source".
However if this is true, nVidia's in for a RUUUDE awakening. This will be an interesting summer, as the green team's flagship 650 USD card won't have as much shader processing power as ATI's mainstream 150-200 USD card. All we gotta hope for is good drivers I guess. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mean Machine Hardwareaholic

Joined: 03 Dec 2004 Posts: 1749 Location: Stockholm, Sweden
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
With the launch drawing close, I wouldn't doubt these slides, to be honest... I'm really hoping for AMD to turn things round, and with the prices and yields I see no real trouble, other than people's reluctancy to buy anything else than NVIDIA cards... _________________ Man, or woman, or both?
Grandis spiritus, sanctus diavolos |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Delph1 Master of Science

Joined: 11 Dec 2003 Posts: 4750 Location: Pennybridge, Sweden
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A lot of people have been fed with planted information as far as I know. Anyone under NDA can't say anything so you will just have to wait and see
//Andreas _________________ "I'm sort of a postmodern vegetarian, I eat meat ironically"
"You are our Swedish superhero "
Forget everything, knowledge is your enemy, it's only going to make you second-guess yourself." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Skyguy Writer
Joined: 09 Oct 2007 Posts: 145 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've been waiting for a good ATI card to feed my Maximus X38......maybe this is it. Must feed the Maximus!!!! _________________
Lian-Li A71B | Q6600 @ 3.5 on TEC/H2O | ASUS Maximus SE X38 | 4gb Corsair Dominators - 8500 | Raptors RAID 0 | 1Tb Barracudas | MSI 8800 Ultra SC | Coolermaster 850w | 2x22" Dell LCD | X-Fi Xtreme | G15 Rev.2 | G5 Rev.2 | |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hsew Member

Joined: 08 Jun 2008 Posts: 25 Location: In ur PC stealin' ur Megahertz
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
well, a couple of months ago I did hear that ATI was aiming for double the performance/power consumtion in this new generation vs its last (it would make sense when you look at the transition from the 2900 to the 3870, same performance, half the power consumption) Maybe now they're gonna try a double performance/same power consumption.
Won't this be funny, ATI's mainstream card will have more shader processing power (and obviously lower power consumption) than "envy's" for less than 1/3 the price. Looks like it all comes down to driver quality at this point. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Delph1 Master of Science

Joined: 11 Dec 2003 Posts: 4750 Location: Pennybridge, Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mean Machine Hardwareaholic

Joined: 03 Dec 2004 Posts: 1749 Location: Stockholm, Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I want a HD4870 badly and fast. _________________ Man, or woman, or both?
Grandis spiritus, sanctus diavolos |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
reaperrr Member
Joined: 06 Jun 2008 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
3870: 320x775=248000
4850: 800x625=500000
4870: 800x750=600000
That means the 4850 has ~100% and 4870 even has ~142%(!) more theoretical Shaderpower. Of course a part of these additional SPs might be dedicated to AA and Physics, but it's impressive nontheless.
Add the fact that RV770 also has at least twice as many TMUs, much more memory bandwidth and probably heavily improved ROPs, we might see some really impressive performance gains over RV670.
Now the only thing that might sound unrealistic about this is the modest increase in die-size. How could they squeeze additional 480 SPs and presumably additional 16-24 TMUs into only 33% additional transistors/diesize?
When the 800 SP rumor first came up, I discarded it as wrong for that reason.
But I've done some maths and some thinking, and I realized something: Maybe the amount of R600/RV670 transistors that were for mem interface, composition engine (for Crossfire), UVD, on-board audio, the Tesselation engine and ROPs was much higher than we assumed, and eventually the SPs and TMUs were not as transistor-heavy as we thought. Keep in mind everything else except for SPs and TMUs remained more or less the same and was only tweaked a bit. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Delph1 Master of Science

Joined: 11 Dec 2003 Posts: 4750 Location: Pennybridge, Sweden
|
Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The RV770 shaders are extremely small. I remember hearing something over a couple of beers about how they could throw thousands of them into a GPU with ease, but that's not what they want to do right now. They're much, much smaller than the NVIDIA shaders.
The shaders only make up part of the core, we don't know exactly how much, but if I'm not mistaking, the majority of the expanded die-size is not used by the shaders, but the new texture units.
//Andreas _________________ "I'm sort of a postmodern vegetarian, I eat meat ironically"
"You are our Swedish superhero "
Forget everything, knowledge is your enemy, it's only going to make you second-guess yourself." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
reaperrr Member
Joined: 06 Jun 2008 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Delph1 wrote: | The shaders only make up part of the core, we don't know exactly how much, but if I'm not mistaking, the majority of the expanded die-size is not used by the shaders, but the new texture units.
//Andreas |
Just what I suspected
I'm really curious how the new texture units will look like. I saw on some diagrams at xbitlabs that the R6xx texture units each consist of 8 Texture Adress Processors, 20 FP32 Texture Samplers and 4 Texture Filter Units, and R600/RV670 have 4 texture units.
I suspect they revamped those to a more balanced 8-32-8 config and added a 5th texture unit, which would result in 25%/100%/150% more power per clock for each respective area of texture processing. At least I think this would be more efficient than simply increasing the number of texture units.
But its just a guess
Now with RV770 having that many SPs, I wonder how many their new mainstream/low-end parts will have? Considering the current pricing structure, making a RV730/740 that is slower than a 3850 256MB would make little sense, unless it is as cheap or cheaper to make than RV635... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Delph1 Master of Science

Joined: 11 Dec 2003 Posts: 4750 Location: Pennybridge, Sweden
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 6:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
If we had a block diagram we could do some guessing, but I'm not sure how they are aligned.
I would assume we're still in for something that's superior to RV670 with RV735 though.
//Andreas _________________ "I'm sort of a postmodern vegetarian, I eat meat ironically"
"You are our Swedish superhero "
Forget everything, knowledge is your enemy, it's only going to make you second-guess yourself." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aca Member

Joined: 31 Oct 2007 Posts: 111 Location: Delft, The Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| What do you think: is the RV770 bandwidth limited?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cizoe Member
Joined: 13 Jun 2008 Posts: 3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Delph1 Master of Science

Joined: 11 Dec 2003 Posts: 4750 Location: Pennybridge, Sweden
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aca wrote: | | What do you think: is the RV770 bandwidth limited?? |
4850 will be somewhat limited by the GDDR3 , but not 4870. I think that's part reason for the 1.8GHz GDDR5, the other being power consumption.
//Andreas _________________ "I'm sort of a postmodern vegetarian, I eat meat ironically"
"You are our Swedish superhero "
Forget everything, knowledge is your enemy, it's only going to make you second-guess yourself." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|